In the First Web Era – that period loosely defined as after NCSA Mosaic and before MySpace – technology was highly visible. The narrative of the Internet, the Web, the dreaded “information superhighway,” was a tale of atoms moving to bits, a techno time-suck to some and nirvana to others who, sans the ability to woo a proper mate or get a decent haircut, simultaneously hid behind this new technology while creating some of its greatest advances and services.
Theirs was a web of computers and information; a channel for anonymity, where computers talked and people provided data only when required (such as in the form of credit card information.) The Internet was commerce and convenience – and while there were apps like e-mail and Usenet and AOL forums, the Internet was a mostly static infrastructure with no real, ongoing, or even global conversation.
Technology was permanent -- but conversation was transient.
Now as we reach the end of the Second Web Era, the web is, more than anything, a “place” – a social construct rather than a technological one. Technology is necessary but in many ways anathema to making the Web work, to connection and collaboration.
Ours is a web of web of actions and ideas; a place for community, where people talk and computers process, providing support only when asked. Technologies, platforms and channels – they are fleeting, from MySpace to Facebook and Bebo; from blogs to Twitter. But sociological imperatives like human interaction and the desire to bond with others like ourselves is as constant and as essential to us as breathing.
Today, technology is transient – but conversation is permanent.
Re-Defining Social Media
The only word in the English language that means what it’s supposed to mean is “word.” Everything is else is created by us and defined by use, perception or time.
Depending who you ask, social media is “any media that’s not traditional or established media.” To some it’s a channel, to others it’s a place. Some see it only as technology. Some say it should be “owned” by PR, others say by marketing.
The truth is social media can be all those things – or none of them. It depends on the context of the question or purpose of the intended objective.
Ultimately, however, social media is defined by social interaction. I mean, the word “social” is right there in the name, yet there are still those who believe that putting a press release on a blog with the comment feature disabled is still somehow “social media.” This may be “sharable” media because of the technology platform, but it’s a long way from social.
Yes, some still just think of social media as tools, but they are shortsighted. I can’t count how many times people have said to me “what’s your social media toolkit” or “isn’t social media just a bunch of tactics.”
Companies don’t want to blog or be on Facebook – they want to connect with their customers, and if a blog or Facebook is the best way to do that, then great. What’s important is to be with your audience, not the latest technology. The technologies will change, but the conversations will go on, with or without you.
The Third Web Era
Social media is the grail of permanent conversation, the vessel for a Third Web Era where technology does what it’s supposed to do when it becomes ubiquitous – disappear.
In the First Web Era, we needed computers, but computers didn’t need us. That’s all changed – computers need us to survive and expand. They need our intelligence, our data and our conversations. In this Third Era, if we go away, so does the Web.
2009 is the tenth anniversary of this quote by Tim Berners-Lee, father and still patriarch of the World Wide Web:
“I have a dream for the Web [in which computers] become capable of analyzing all the data on the Web – the content, links, and transactions between people and computers. A ‘Semantic Web’, which should make this possible, has yet to emerge, but when it does, the day-to-day mechanisms of trade, bureaucracy and our daily lives will be handled by machines talking to machines. The ‘intelligent agents’ people have touted for ages will finally materialize.”
I believe he was part right. Yes, “intelligent agents” are here and are helping us manage day-to-day tasks like news gathering or auto-loading debit cards. The “Semantic Web” is coming, powered by the still untapped potential of search and delivering a “home page” to each according to their interests and desires, by computers that “learn” and make choices on our behalf.
But the Web today – and the one of tomorrow – is a Web of function as well as emotion, and neither can exist without the other. If technology is the heart of the Third Web Era, then conversation is its soul.
Information exists, but conversation persists. That conversation may take many forms, yet people are talking all the time and they are not going to stop. And if you don’t want to join, you at least need to listen.
The Permanent Conversation is here. Where are you?


Comments (3)
Beautiful observation "if technology is the heart of the web...then conversation is its soul"
The semantic web is already dawning. Semantic browser extensions like http://headup.com and social/semantic search engines like http://delver.com and http://collarity.com are already delivering users with semantic and personalized information. I think that the tipping point will come when one of these services starts drawing in new users on Google-like scale.
Mike
"I tweet @pop_art"
:)
Posted by Mike Darnell | December 22, 2008 8:32 AM
Posted on December 22, 2008 08:32
Gary, this is a great post - this is one of the more thoughtful (and digestible) observations I've seen re: how the Web has evolved, and what it all means. You've got my head spinning (in a good way!)
Nancy
Posted by nancy ruscheinski | December 22, 2008 3:07 PM
Posted on December 22, 2008 15:07
Fantastic post Gary.
The obvious outcome of the wholesale shift to Permanent Conversation is the shrinkage of industries that once relied upon the "assumed conversation".
Advertising agencies find that the contraptions they build (advertisements of various types) are less relevant and/or cheaper to build, therefore more difficult to markup.
Media agencies find ads and media placement less relevant - due to continuous partial attention and as marketers cut their budgets and shift their efforts towards engagement.
Creativity is being outsourced - from open source software to open source marketing.
Distribution is moving - from appointment based, one way distribution to on-demand, location independent, reviewer referred YouTube and BitTorrent.
And most importantly - conversation is everywhere - not just "content in common", but genuine community - sharing, conversing, informing, agreeing and arguing all at once.
Instead of focussing on creating and selling the marketing, most companies have to refocus on sharing their story. If they do, they'll succeed.
Posted by Con Frantzeskos | December 23, 2008 12:19 AM
Posted on December 23, 2008 00:19